spacerspacerspacerspacerspacer
Center for BiosecurityUPMC | University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
horizontal rulespacer


Areas of Focus

  
Special Topics
  
Resources
The Center

 

This Website is supported by funding from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.
Home > Biosecurity Briefing > Archive > Avian/Pandemic Influenza > Reports > 2007 Flu Biosecurity Briefing > FDA Panel Votes for Stronger Warnings on Flu Drugs (11-30-2007)
Tools:||Link to this page| Share this page
horizontal rule
spacer

Biosecurity Briefing

Subscribe | About | Current Issue | RSS | Archive

FDA Panel Votes for Stronger Warnings on Flu Drugs

By Kunal Rambhia, November 30, 2007

On November 27, 2007, the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy (CIDRAP) at the University of Minnesota reported that the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Pediatric Advisory Committee voted to recommend stronger language on warning labels of two antiviral flu medications, oseltamivir (brand name Tamiflu®) and zanamivir.  This decision is based on the committee’s review of adverse neuropsychiatric events among children and teens and calls upon the FDA to require that manufacturers of these drugs include labels warning that several patients died as a result of these events. In 2006, the FDA Pediatric Advisory Committee stated that “it would monitor adverse-event reports over the next two flu seasons to determine if further precautions are needed.”1  Since then, oseltamivir manufacturer Roche has included a warning label regarding neuropsychiatric events; if the FDA were to accept the 2007 recommendations of its advisory committee, Roche would be required to strengthen the warning language on its packaging.  Zanamivir is not currently sold with a warning label.

On November 27, 2007, the Associated Press (AP) reported that Roche asserts the evidence does not support a link between the drug and “increased risk of psychiatric problems.”2 Citing a company study of 150,000 patients, Roche maintains that the influenza virus, not the drug, is to blame for these adverse symptoms. GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), maker of the zanamivir drug Relenza, also disagrees with the committee’s findings, noting that none of the 145 neuropsychiatric cases reported in association with Relenza was fatal.  Neither company believes “the evidence warrants labeling changes.”1  However, in a November 28, 2007, AP report, a Roche spokesperson said that the company will accept the recommendation of the advisory committee.

Since its release in 1999, oseltamivir has been administered to 48 million patients. A total of 600 cases of psychiatric events have been reported, mostly among children and teens. Japan, which “accounts for two thirds of the $2.4 billion global market for Tamiflu® because doctors there almost always prescribe drugs to treat flu symptoms,” has reported 21 out of the 25 deaths involving psychiatric events.2 The remaining deaths were reported in the United States (n=3) and Egypt (n=1). The FDA has monitored adverse events associated with oseltamivir use since self-injury and delirium were first reported among Japanese patients in 2005.2

References

  1. FDA panel seeks stronger label warnings for 2 flu drugs. CIDRAP. November 27, 2007. http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/panflu/news/nov2707tamiflu2.html. Accessed November 27, 2007.
  2. Stronger warning of mental issues from flu drug. The Associated Press. November 27, 2007. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21993624/. Accessed November 27, 2007.
  3. Roche accepts FDA's Tamiflu proposal.  The Associated Press.  November 28, 2007.  http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5i56MRE44K2WFviqxea-SCPtiRpIwD8T6MI0G0.  Accessed November 30, 2007.